2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs. 2015 Ford Mustang GT Comparison

2015 Ford Mustang GT Front Exterior Design

Many people know that Chevy Camaro and Mustang GT always have the best rivalries ever. In fact, many people are comparing 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs. 2015 Ford Mustang GT. If you are looking at the details of the year, this cannot be considered as one fair comparison. That is because the 2016 Camaro is compared with 2015 Mustang. However, since both of those cars are the latest from its generation, you can say that it is fair enough to compare those two cars. As an addition to that, there are also some aspects that one car overtakes another.

VEHICLE 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS 2015 Ford Mustang GT
BASE PRICE $37,295 $33,295
PRICE AS TESTED $47,480 $43,070
DIMENSIONS
LENGTH 188.3 inches 188.3 inches
WIDTH 74.7 inches 75.4 inches
HEIGHT 53.1 inches 54.4 inches
WHEELBASE 110.7 inches 107.1 inches
FRONT TRACK 63.0 inches 62.3 inches
REAR TRACK 62.9 inches 64.9 inches
INTERIOR VOLUME F: 54 cubic feet
R: 31 cubic feet
F: 55 cubic feet
R: 32 cubic feet
TRUNK 9 cubic feet 14 cubic feet
POWERTRAIN
ENGINE pushrod 16-valve V-8
376 cu in (6162 cc)
DOHC 32-valve V-8
302 cu in (4951 cc)
POWER HP @ RPM 455 @ 6000 435 @ 6500
TORQUE LB-FT @ RPM 455 @ 4400 400 @ 4250
REDLINE / FUEL CUTOFF 6500/6600 rpm 7000/7000 rpm
LB PER HP 8.3 8.8
DRIVELINE
TRANSMISSION 8-speed automatic 6-speed manual
DRIVEN WHEELS rear rear
GEAR RATIO:1/
MPH PER 1000 RPM/
MAX MPH
1 4.56/6.4/42
2 2.97/9.8/65
3 2.08/14.1/93
4 1.69/17.1/113
5 1.27/22.9/151
6 1.00/28.6/165
7 0.85/33.9/165
8 0.65/44.5/165
1 3.66/5.8/41
2 2.43/8.8/62
3 1.69/12.7/89
4 1.31/16.3/114
5 1.00/21.8/153
6 0.65/34.0/164
AXLE RATIO:1 2.77, limited slip 3.73, limited slip
CHASSIS
SUSPENSION F: struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar
F: struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar
BRAKES F: 13.6-inch vented disc
R: 13.3-inch vented disc
F: 15.0-inch vented disc
R: 13.0-inch vented disc
STABILITY CONTROL fully defeatable, traction off, competition mode fully defeatable, traction off, competition mode, launch control
TIRES Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat
F: 245/40ZR-20 95Y
R: 275/35ZR-20 (98Y)
Pirelli P Zero
F: 255/40ZR-19 96Y
R: 275/40ZR-19 101Y
ACCELERATION
0–30 MPH 1.6 sec 1.7 sec
0–60 MPH 3.9 sec 4.4 sec
0–100 MPH 8.9 sec 10.5 sec
0–150 MPH 25.1 sec 29.0 sec
¼-MILE @ MPH 12.3 sec @ 116 13.0 sec @ 112
ROLLING START, 5–60 MPH 4.0 sec 4.8 sec
TOP GEAR, 30–50 MPH 2.3 sec 9.1 sec
TOP GEAR, 50–70 MPH 2.7 sec 8.6 sec
TOP SPEED 165 mph (gov ltd, C/D est) 164 mph (gov ltd)
CHASSIS
BRAKING 70–0 MPH 147 feet 157 feet
ROADHOLDING, 300-FT-DIA SKIDPAD 0.98 g 0.94 g
610-FT SLALOM 43.9 mph 43.3 mph
WEIGHT
CURB 3760 pounds 3817 pounds
FRONT/REAR 53.7/46.3 53.8/46.2
CG HEIGHT 20.5 inches 20.0 inches
FUEL
TANK 19.0 gallons 16.0 gallons
RATING 91 octane 91 octane
EPA CITY/HWY 16/26 mpg* 15/25 mpg
C/D 700-MILE TRIP 18 mpg 17 mpg
SOUND LEVEL
IDLE 49 dBA 50 dBA
FULL THROTTLE 91 dBA 84 dBA
70-MPH CRUISE 73 dBA 74 dBA

Starting with the price, you cannot expect the older car to have the more expensive cars. However, the difference is not that much since 2016 Camaro is tagged around 47,000 and the older 2015 Mustang is about 43,000. The next comparison of 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs. 2015 Ford Mustang GT is from the size. The overall interior of these cars has the same size. However, Mustang has the bigger trunk capacity that makes this car is slightly bigger from Camaro, about 5 cubic feet only.

The next one is the engine. When you are talking about manual, then Mustang is your best choice since Camaro is using the automatic transmission. The choice is all yours at please. For the overall engine power, Camaro has 455HP and Mustang has 425HP. That cannot be considered as much different. Therefore, pick one that will give you more comfort. The last 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs. 2015 Ford Mustang GT is the fuel. For the efficiency, both has the similar of 18mpg for the efficiency. However, Camaro has the bigger tank capacity that can fit up to 19 gallons while Mustang is only 16 gallons. So, which one you will choose from both of these cars?

Pictures gallery of 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs. 2015 Ford Mustang GT Comparison

  • Performance Chevrolet Camaro SS 2016
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Wheel
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Rear Seats
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Performance Test
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Front Seats Interior Preview
  • 2015 Ford Mustang GT Front Interior Preview
  • 2015 Ford Mustang GT vs 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Performance Comparison
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS and 2015 Ford Mustang GT Comparison Test
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS and 2015 Ford Mustang GT Comparison
  • Side Exterior 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS
  • All-New Chevrolet Camaro SS 2016
  • All-New 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Top View
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Side Exterior Design
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Front Side Exterior Preview
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Front Seats Interior
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Front End Design
  • 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Front Bumper
2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs. 2015 Ford Mustang GT Comparison | Tomas S | 4.5


Previous postThe Specifications of 2015 Tesla Model S P90D Next postOverview: 2015 Bentley Continental GT Speed

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Auto Performance and Reviews