The Battle of 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V

2016 Cadillac ATS-V Twin-Turbocharged 3.6-liter V-6 Engine

The battle between the new cars in the class of sedan is happening between 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V. all of those cars can be considered as one of the best that all of the manufacturers made for the sedan class. Because of that reason too, the battle of those care are totally awesome.

VEHICLE 2015 BMW M3 2016 Cadillac ATS-V 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S
BASE PRICE $62,950 $61,460 $72,825
PRICE AS TESTED $84,325 $73,655 $91,585
DIMENSIONS
LENGTH 184.5 inches 184.0 inches 187.2 inches
WIDTH 73.9 inches 71.3 inches 72.4 inches
HEIGHT 56.1 inches 55.7 inches 56.1 inches
WHEELBASE 110.7 inches 109.3 inches 111.8 inches
FRONT TRACK 62.2 inches 60.5 inches 63.3 inches
REAR TRACK 63.1 inches 60.4 inches 60.9 inches
INTERIOR VOLUME F: 54 cubic feet
R: 42 cubic feet
F: 50 cubic feet
R: 34 cubic feet
F: 51 cubic feet
R: 44 cubic feet
TRUNK 12 cubic feet 10 cubic feet 13 cubic feet
POWERTRAIN
ENGINE twin-turbocharged DOHC 24-valve inline-6
182 cu in (2979 cc)
twin-turbocharged DOHC 24-valve V-6
217 cu in (3564 cc)
twin-turbocharged DOHC 32-valve V-8
243 cu in (3982 cc)
POWER HP @ RPM 425 @ 7300 464 @ 5850 503 @ 6250
TORQUE LB-FT @ RPM 406 @ 1850 445 @ 3500 516 @ 1750
REDLINE / FUEL CUTOFF 7500/7500 rpm 6500/6500 rpm 7000/7000 rpm
LB PER HP 8.5 8.2 7.8
DRIVELINE
TRANSMISSION 7-speed dual-clutch automatic 8-speed automatic 7-speed automatic
DRIVEN WHEELS rear rear rear
GEAR RATIO:1/
MPH PER 1000 RPM/
MAX MPH
1 4.81/4.7/35
2 2.59/8.7/65
3 1.70/13.2/99
4 1.28/17.7/133
5 1.00/22.2/163
6 0.84/26.8/163
7 0.67/33.7/163
1 4.56/5.7/37
2 2.97/8.7/57
3 2.08/12.4/81
4 1.69/15.3/99
5 1.27/20.4/133
6 1.00/25.9/168
7 0.85/30.4/185
8 0.65/39.8/180
1 4.38/6.0/42
2 2.86/9.3/65
3 1.92/13.8/97
4 1.37/19.3/135
5 1.00/26.5/180
6 0.82/32.3/180
7 0.73/36.3/180
AXLE RATIO:1 3.46, limited slip 2.85, limited slip 2.82, limited slip
CHASSIS
SUSPENSION F: struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar
F: struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar
F: control arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar
BRAKES F: 15.8-inch vented, cross-drilled, ceramic disc
R: 15.0-inch vented, cross-drilled, ceramic disc
F: 14.5-inch vented disc
R: 13.3-inch vented disc
F: 15.8-inch vented, cross-drilled, ceramic disc
R: 14.2-inch vented, cross-drilled disc
STABILITY CONTROL fully defeatable, competition mode, launch control fully defeatable, traction off, competition mode, launch control fully defeatable, competition mode, launch control
TIRES Michelin Pilot Super Sport
F: 255/35ZR-19 (92Y)
R: 275/35ZR-19 (100Y)
Michelin Pilot Super Sport
F: 255/35ZR-18 (94Y)
R: 275/35ZR-18 (99Y)
Michelin Pilot Super Sport
F: 245/35ZR-19 93Y
R: 265/35ZR-19 98Y
ACCELERATION
0–30 MPH 1.7 sec 1.8 sec 1.5 sec
0–60 MPH 3.8 sec 3.9 sec 3.9 sec
0–100 MPH 8.8 sec 8.4 sec 9.1 sec
0–150 MPH 23.3 sec 19.8 sec 23.7 sec
¼-MILE @ MPH 12.2 sec @ 117 12.1 sec @ 122 12.2 sec @ 116
ROLLING START, 5–60 MPH 4.4 sec 4.7 sec 4.3 sec
TOP GEAR, 30–50 MPH 2.3 sec 2.4 sec 2.4 sec
TOP GEAR, 50–70 MPH 2.8 sec 3.2 sec 2.8 sec
TOP SPEED 163 mph (gov ltd) 185 mph (drag ltd, mfr’s claim) 180 mph (gov ltd, mfr’s claim)
CHASSIS
BRAKING 70–0 MPH 150 feet 154 feet 147 feet
ROADHOLDING,
300-FT-DIA SKIDPAD
0.97 g 1.02 g 0.98 g
610-FT SLALOM 45.5 mph 45.1 mph 44.4 mph
WEIGHT
CURB 3608 pounds 3800 pounds 3939 pounds
FRONT/REAR 52.1/47.9 52.5/47.5 54.3/45.7
FUEL
TANK 15.8 gallons 16.0 gallons 18.0 gallons
RATING 93 octane 91 octane 91 octane
EPA CITY/HWY 17/24 mpg 16/24 mpg 18/25 mpg
C/D 550-MILE TRIP 20 mpg 17 mpg 17 mpg
SOUND LEVEL
IDLE 47 dBA 42 dBA 41 dBA
FULL THROTTLE 89 dBA 83 dBA 78 dBA
70-MPH CRUISE 69 dBA 68 dBA 68 dBA

Starting with the look, you can say that all of those cars have their own unique look that you cannot simply compare. The main thing that you can simply say as similar from those cars’ look is the modernity design. You can see the modern look from all of those cars. Therefore, you will not need to worry about the average look of the car. Going inside the cabin of this car, you can also say that the battle is tight. However, the main thing is that the interior of 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V is not that similar after all. All of those cars have its own characteristic that will only suit the need of the drivers.

The Battle of 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S vs 2015 BMW M3 vs 2016 Cadillac ATS-V 2015 BMW M3 vs 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S vs 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Comparison However, one of the best battles happens for the engine and the price of the cars. That is because all of the people want to get the fast cars with the cheap price. If you are talking about the engine, BMW is on the lowest position with the maximum capability of 425HP. The next one is Cadillac with 464HP and the best one is Mercedes with 503HP. Unfortunately, the price for 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V is not that much of happiness either. That is because the base price of BMW is tagged around 62,000 dollars, similar with Cadillac. However, the most expensive base price is still taken by Mercedes with 72,000 dollars.

Pictures gallery of The Battle of 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V

  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Test Drive
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Speedometer
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Exterior in Motion
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Side Exterior Design
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Side Design
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Seats Interior
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Performance
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Cockpit and Dashboard
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Front View
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Front Seats Interior
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Exterior Preview
  • 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Twin-Turbocharged 3.6-liter V-6 Engine
  • 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Test Drive
  • 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Speedometer
  • 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Side Design
  • 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Rear Side Exterior
  • 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Rear Seats Interior
  • 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Performance Test
The Battle of 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V | Tomas S | 4.5


Previous post2015 Acura NSX Changes in Engine Next post2015 Mercedes-Benz S-Class Coupe Specification

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Auto Performance and Reviews