2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Side Exterior Design

2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Side Exterior Design

Previous Photo2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Side Design Next Photo2016 Cadillac ATS-V Exterior in Motion


The battle between the new cars in the class of sedan is happening between 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V. all of those cars can be considered as one of the best that all of the manufacturers made for the sedan class. Because of that reason too, the battle of those care are totally awesome.

VEHICLE2015 BMW M32016 Cadillac ATS-V2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S
BASE PRICE$62,950$61,460$72,825
PRICE AS TESTED$84,325$73,655$91,585
DIMENSIONS
LENGTH184.5 inches184.0 inches187.2 inches
WIDTH73.9 inches71.3 inches72.4 inches
HEIGHT56.1 inches55.7 inches56.1 inches
WHEELBASE110.7 inches109.3 inches111.8 inches
FRONT TRACK62.2 inches60.5 inches63.3 inches
REAR TRACK63.1 inches60.4 inches60.9 inches
INTERIOR VOLUMEF: 54 cubic feet
R: 42 cubic feet
F: 50 cubic feet
R: 34 cubic feet
F: 51 cubic feet
R: 44 cubic feet
TRUNK12 cubic feet10 cubic feet13 cubic feet
POWERTRAIN
ENGINEtwin-turbocharged DOHC 24-valve inline-6
182 cu in (2979 cc)
twin-turbocharged DOHC 24-valve V-6
217 cu in (3564 cc)
twin-turbocharged DOHC 32-valve V-8
243 cu in (3982 cc)
POWER HP @ RPM425 @ 7300464 @ 5850503 @ 6250
TORQUE LB-FT @ RPM406 @ 1850445 @ 3500516 @ 1750
REDLINE / FUEL CUTOFF7500/7500 rpm6500/6500 rpm7000/7000 rpm
LB PER HP8.58.27.8
DRIVELINE
TRANSMISSION7-speed dual-clutch automatic8-speed automatic7-speed automatic
DRIVEN WHEELSrearrearrear
GEAR RATIO:1/
MPH PER 1000 RPM/
MAX MPH
1 4.81/4.7/35
2 2.59/8.7/65
3 1.70/13.2/99
4 1.28/17.7/133
5 1.00/22.2/163
6 0.84/26.8/163
7 0.67/33.7/163
1 4.56/5.7/37
2 2.97/8.7/57
3 2.08/12.4/81
4 1.69/15.3/99
5 1.27/20.4/133
6 1.00/25.9/168
7 0.85/30.4/185
8 0.65/39.8/180
1 4.38/6.0/42
2 2.86/9.3/65
3 1.92/13.8/97
4 1.37/19.3/135
5 1.00/26.5/180
6 0.82/32.3/180
7 0.73/36.3/180
AXLE RATIO:13.46, limited slip2.85, limited slip2.82, limited slip
CHASSIS
SUSPENSIONF: struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar
F: struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar
F: control arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar
BRAKESF: 15.8-inch vented, cross-drilled, ceramic disc
R: 15.0-inch vented, cross-drilled, ceramic disc
F: 14.5-inch vented disc
R: 13.3-inch vented disc
F: 15.8-inch vented, cross-drilled, ceramic disc
R: 14.2-inch vented, cross-drilled disc
STABILITY CONTROLfully defeatable, competition mode, launch controlfully defeatable, traction off, competition mode, launch controlfully defeatable, competition mode, launch control
TIRESMichelin Pilot Super Sport
F: 255/35ZR-19 (92Y)
R: 275/35ZR-19 (100Y)
Michelin Pilot Super Sport
F: 255/35ZR-18 (94Y)
R: 275/35ZR-18 (99Y)
Michelin Pilot Super Sport
F: 245/35ZR-19 93Y
R: 265/35ZR-19 98Y
ACCELERATION
0–30 MPH1.7 sec1.8 sec1.5 sec
0–60 MPH3.8 sec3.9 sec3.9 sec
0–100 MPH8.8 sec8.4 sec9.1 sec
0–150 MPH23.3 sec19.8 sec23.7 sec
¼-MILE @ MPH12.2 sec @ 11712.1 sec @ 12212.2 sec @ 116
ROLLING START, 5–60 MPH4.4 sec4.7 sec4.3 sec
TOP GEAR, 30–50 MPH2.3 sec2.4 sec2.4 sec
TOP GEAR, 50–70 MPH2.8 sec3.2 sec2.8 sec
TOP SPEED163 mph (gov ltd)185 mph (drag ltd, mfr’s claim)180 mph (gov ltd, mfr’s claim)
CHASSIS
BRAKING 70–0 MPH150 feet154 feet147 feet
ROADHOLDING,
300-FT-DIA SKIDPAD
0.97 g1.02 g0.98 g
610-FT SLALOM45.5 mph45.1 mph44.4 mph
WEIGHT
CURB3608 pounds3800 pounds3939 pounds
FRONT/REAR52.1/47.952.5/47.554.3/45.7
FUEL
TANK15.8 gallons16.0 gallons18.0 gallons
RATING93 octane91 octane91 octane
EPA CITY/HWY17/24 mpg16/24 mpg18/25 mpg
C/D 550-MILE TRIP20 mpg17 mpg17 mpg
SOUND LEVEL
IDLE47 dBA42 dBA41 dBA
FULL THROTTLE89 dBA83 dBA78 dBA
70-MPH CRUISE69 dBA68 dBA68 dBA

Starting with the look, you can say that all of those cars have their own unique look that you cannot simply compare. The main thing that you can simply say as similar from those cars’ look is the modernity design. You can see the modern look from all of those cars. Therefore, you will not need to worry about the average look of the car. Going inside the cabin of this car, you can also say that the battle is tight. However, the main thing is that the interior of 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V is not that similar after all. All of those cars have its own characteristic that will only suit the need of the drivers.

However, one of the best battles happens for the engine and the price of the cars. That is because all of the people want to get the fast cars with the cheap price. If you are talking about the engine, BMW is on the lowest position with the maximum capability of 425HP. The next one is Cadillac with 464HP and the best one is Mercedes with 503HP. Unfortunately, the price for 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V is not that much of happiness either. That is because the base price of BMW is tagged around 62,000 dollars, similar with Cadillac. However, the most expensive base price is still taken by Mercedes with 72,000 dollars.

You are viewing 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Side Exterior Design, picture size 2250x1375 posted by Tomas S at December 15, 2015. Don't forget to browse another photo in the related category or you can browse our other interesting photo that we have. Please also read our Privacy Policy and DCMA for the copyright of the images.

Back to The Battle of 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V

Expand about 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Side Exterior Design

2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Side Exterior Design Pictures

2016 Cadillac ATS-V Test Drive2016 Cadillac ATS-V Speedometer2016 Cadillac ATS-V Exterior in Motion2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Side Exterior Design2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Side Design2016 Cadillac ATS-V Rear Seats Interior2016 Cadillac ATS-V Performance2016 Cadillac ATS-V Cockpit and Dashboard2016 Cadillac ATS-V Front View2016 Cadillac ATS-V Front Seats Interior2016 Cadillac ATS-V Exterior Preview2016 Cadillac ATS-V Twin-Turbocharged 3.6-liter V-6 Engine2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Test Drive2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Speedometer2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Side Design2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Rear Side Exterior2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Rear Seats Interior2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Performance Test2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Front Side Exterior2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Front Seats Interior2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Exterior Preview2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Twin-Turbocharged 4.0-Liter V-8 Engine2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S-Model Cockpit and Dashboard2015 BMW M3 Test Drive2015 BMW M3 Speedometer2015 BMW M3 Sedan2015 BMW M3 Sedan Exterior Overview2015 BMW M3 Rear Seats Interior2015 BMW M3 Performance Test2015 BMW M3 Interior Cockpit and Dashboard2015 BMW M3 Front Seats Interior2015 BMW M3 Front ExteriorThe Battle of 2015 BMW M3 vs. 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S, 2016 Cadillac ATS-V2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S vs 2015 BMW M3 vs 2016 Cadillac ATS-V2015 BMW M3 vs 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S vs 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Comparison
New 2016 BMW 750i xDrive WhiteMost Googled Car Brands In 20162018 BMW Alpina B5 Biturbo Rear View2015 Hyundai Sonata Auto Show2015 Cadillac ATS Coupe Interior Cockpit2016 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Supercar2015 Hyundai Genesis V8 Engine View2018 Rolls Royce Phantom VIII Rear ViewWheel Trim Audi S7 Sedan 2016New 2015 Acura NSX Interior Concept2015 Ford Transit 150 EcoBoostNew 2016 Infiniti QX502015 Hyundai i20 Front Design PreviewNew 2016 BMW 640i Convertible2015 chevrolet colorado cockpit dimensionsNext 2016 Mitsubishi ASX2015 BMW M3 Twin-Turbocharged 3.0-Liter Inline-6 Engine2017 Chrysler 200 Rear View2017 Subaru WRX Rear View2018 Bentley Continental Supersports Rear View2018 McLaren 720S Front View2015 Cadillac Escalade Platinum Edition Black Interior2016 Mazda 2 Interior Preview2017 Toyota Prius Prime Interior View
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Auto Performance and Reviews